| 000 | 01480nam a22002657a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 509 | ||
| 003 | MBIP | ||
| 005 | 20250409084710.0 | ||
| 008 | 250224b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 020 |
_a9780415433716 _qPaperback |
||
| 040 |
_aMBIP _beng _cMBIP _dNF _erda |
||
| 082 | 0 | 4 |
_a423.13 _bNIG |
| 100 | 1 |
_aWarburton, Nigel, _eauthor. |
|
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_a Thinking from A to Z / _cNigel Warburton. |
| 250 | _aThird Edition | ||
| 264 |
_aDevon : _bRoutledge, _c2007. |
||
| 300 |
_a164 pages ; _c17 cm. |
||
| 520 | _aWhat is 'humpty-dumptying'? Do 'arguments from analogy' ever stand up? How do I know when someone is using 'weasel words'? What's the difference between a 'red herring' and a 'straw man'? This superb book, now in its third edition, will help anyone who wants to argue well and think critically. Using witty and topical examples, this fully-updated edition includes many new entries and updates the whole text. New entries include: Principle of Charity Lawyer's Answer Least Worst Option Poisoning the Well Sentimentality Sunk Cost Fallacy Weasel Words 'You would say that wouldn't you'. Thinking from A to Z may not help you win every argument, but it will definitely give you the power to tell a good one from a bad one. | ||
| 650 | 1 | 0 |
_aDebates and debating _vDictionaries |
| 650 | 1 | 0 |
_aMedicine _vPhilosophy |
| 650 | 1 | 0 |
_aCritical thinking _vDictionaries |
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aLanguage Arts & Disciplines |
| 650 | 1 | 0 |
_aReasoning _vDictionaries |
| 942 |
_2ddc _cBK _n0 |
||
| 999 |
_c1064 _d1064 |
||